Which term describes reasoning that moves from specific instances to broader generalizations?

Inductive reasoning is the process of drawing general conclusions from specific observations or instances. This type of reasoning starts with specific details or occurrences, then looks for patterns or trends to form a broader conclusion. For example, if you observe that the sun has risen every day you’ve seen, you might conclude that the sun will rise every day.

In contrast, deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and deduces specific instances that must be true if the general statement is true. Analogous reasoning involves drawing parallels between two similar situations, while a logical fallacy refers to an error in reasoning. Thus, inductive reasoning is the correct term to describe the move from specific instances to a broader generalization.